From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-33929-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 26341 invoked by alias); 17 Jun 2004 20:40:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 26267 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2004 20:40:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 17 Jun 2004 20:40:18 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5HKeIe1007374
	for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 16:40:18 -0400
Received: from zenia.home.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i5HKeG014978;
	Thu, 17 Jun 2004 16:40:17 -0400
To: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain)
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfc/testsuite] i386-sse.exp: better output if no SSE support
References: <20040617185658.223484B104@berman.michael-chastain.com>
From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 20:40:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <20040617185658.223484B104@berman.michael-chastain.com>
Message-ID: <vt2d63xx6jd.fsf@zenia.home>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00421.txt.bz2


mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) writes:
> This patch fixes i386-sse.exp for compilers that don't support SSE,
> specifically gcc 2.95.3.  Before this patch, the results are:
> 
>    3 ERROR
>    2 WARNING
>   33 FAIL
>    1 UNRESOLVED
> 
> After this patch, the results are a single UNSUPPORTED.
> My view is that people should be reading all their non-PASS results,
> including the UNRESOLVED, UNSUPPORTED, and UNTESTED results.
> We might want to discuss this.
> 
> I tested this on native i686-pc-linux-gnu, gcc 2.95.3 and 3.3.3,
> dwarf-2 and stabs+.  My processor has SSE (Intel Celeron).
> 
> I'm giving this 48 hours for comment and then committing it.

Looks good to me.  Just point me at the Kool-aid and I'll drink away.