Re: Enhanced language support for Modula-2

Jim Blandy
2006-05-04T18:01:34Z

On 5/4/06, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> wrote:
> On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 08:03:36AM +0100, Gaius Mulley wrote:
> > many thanks for approving the docs. Do you want me to repost the
> > corrected patch? Also do you know if the code component of the patch
> > is/was approved?
>
> The last time you posted the patch, Jim Blandy did most of the code
> review. So I've been staying clear of it in hopes that he would look
> at it again this time :-) Jim, if you have a chance, could you look
> at the new patch?

...zzz What? Oh, yes! Why, an entirely rewritten Modula-2 type
printer! Great!

The revised patch looks fine. The only question I have is, what's up
with m2_type_print_base? Is that the way it's supposed to be?