From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7774 invoked by alias); 15 Oct 2005 04:33:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7761 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Oct 2005 04:33:45 -0000 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 04:33:45 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9F4XhHX015301; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 00:33:43 -0400 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (devserv.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.1]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j9F4XhV24591; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 00:33:43 -0400 Received: from theseus.home..redhat.com (vpn26-4.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.26.4]) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9F4XRxf005685; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 00:33:28 -0400 To: Paul Gilliam Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [COMMIT] Add vscr register to 'list' of PowerPC vector registers. References: <200510141213.20387.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> <20051014191504.GA724@nevyn.them.org> <200510141323.02754.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> <20051014202253.GA3764@nevyn.them.org> From: Jim Blandy Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 04:33:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20051014202253.GA3764@nevyn.them.org> (Daniel Jacobowitz's message of "Fri, 14 Oct 2005 16:22:53 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg00129.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 01:23:02PM -0700, Paul Gilliam wrote: >> I went with the least intrusive. >> >> Here is what I comitted: (From 'cvs diff -Nau' this time. Hope this is better. 8-) >> >> >> 2005-10-14 Paul Gilliam >> >> * rs6000-tdep.c (rs6000_register_reggroup_p): Add vscr to test for >> vector registers. > > I wasn't actually approving the patch... but I guess this is OK now > that it's in. I'm not a PowerPC maintainer, but I'm somewhat familiar with the Altivec register set, and this is clearly the right thing.