From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22784 invoked by alias); 23 Sep 2003 22:33:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22776 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2003 22:33:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zenia.home) (12.223.225.216) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Sep 2003 22:33:34 -0000 Received: by zenia.home (Postfix, from userid 5433) id EEDCA20762; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 17:30:11 -0500 (EST) To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: carlton@kealia.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: test that GDB tolerates bad #inclusion data References: <200309231803.h8NI3b2c026041@duracef.shout.net> From: Jim Blandy Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 22:33:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200309231803.h8NI3b2c026041@duracef.shout.net> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00514.txt.bz2 Michael Elizabeth Chastain writes: > Jim, we gotta feed you the gdb_test_multiple kool-aid. > See gdb1250.exp or float.exp or watchpoint.exp. Um, why would I want to bow to a charismatic leader's will and commit an act of ultimate self-destruction? > Also, could you avoid the dependency on gcc version by using > preprocessed ".i" files with the bad line numbers already in them? > Instead of / in addition to the tests with C source. Let me fool around a bit with #line directives and see if I can do as well without the -imacro switches. In the end, though, it's up to the compiler to generate correct Dwarf 2 information, so it'll always be compiler-dependent.