From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-27301-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 25849 invoked by alias); 24 Sep 2003 18:13:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 5114 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2003 17:47:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO zenia.home) (12.223.225.216)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Sep 2003 17:47:18 -0000
Received: by zenia.home (Postfix, from userid 5433)
	id 917EF20766; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 12:43:49 -0500 (EST)
To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Cc: carlton@kealia.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFA: test that GDB tolerates bad #inclusion data
References: <200309231803.h8NI3b2c026041@duracef.shout.net>
	<vt28yofcf4c.fsf@zenia.home> <vt2d6dqozp9.fsf@zenia.home>
From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 18:13:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <vt2d6dqozp9.fsf@zenia.home>
Message-ID: <vt28yoeoze2.fsf@zenia.home>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00535.txt.bz2


Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com> writes:
> I'm glad you asked me to revise this:

Oh, and re-doing it helped me realize that it's not a case of GDB
coping with bogus information from the compiler --- a correct test
program, with plausible macro debug info, could also trigger the bug.
Thus the test being renamed from 'badinc' to 'lineinc'.