From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-28144-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 23287 invoked by alias); 23 Oct 2003 21:20:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 23280 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2003 21:20:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO zenia.home) (12.223.225.216)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Oct 2003 21:20:23 -0000
Received: by zenia.home (Postfix, from userid 5433)
	id 31BA820766; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 16:20:03 -0500 (EST)
To: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl>
Cc: carlton@kealia.com, ac131313@redhat.com,
	gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFA: osabi: correct test for compatible handlers
References: <vt2n0buw7r5.fsf@zenia.home> <3F96D128.5040904@redhat.com>
	<vt23cdlvy21 dot fsf at zenia dot home> <3F970598 dot 9020908 at
	redhat dot com> <vt2k76wvp68 dot fsf at zenia dot home>
	<yf28yncg8dx.fsf@hawaii.kealia.com>
	<200310231538.h9NFch0a000511@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org>
From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 21:20:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <200310231538.h9NFch0a000511@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org>
Message-ID: <vt28ynbtzwc.fsf@zenia.home>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00705.txt.bz2


Since the only concerns raised about this change are stylistic, and
the general sense seems to be that it's preferable as is, I've
committed this change.  If people are very concerned about whether
can_run_code_for is a separate function or not, we can always discuss
that as a separate patch.