From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9005 invoked by alias); 6 Nov 2003 07:38:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8998 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2003 07:38:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zenia.home) (12.223.225.216) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Nov 2003 07:38:38 -0000 Received: by zenia.home (Postfix, from userid 5433) id 61517207B4; Thu, 6 Nov 2003 02:37:45 -0500 (EST) To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: give store.exp tests unique names References: <200311060644.hA66i7hx029405@duracef.shout.net> From: Jim Blandy Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 07:38:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200311060644.hA66i7hx029405@duracef.shout.net> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00078.txt.bz2 Michael Elizabeth Chastain writes: > When my Crunch.pl sees a duplicate, it just renames the duplicate > to "gdb.foo/bar {2}", and then "gdb.foo/bar {3}", and so on. > Crunch.pl prints a count of duplicates on stdout but I don't > even pay attention to that any more. > > Most of the duplicates are in tests that always PASS so it's > low priority to get them cleaned up. Did this one in store.exp > cause an actual problem? If it did, I'm all for stomping on it. Yes, I've got a target where some of the tests are failing, and we have an internal regression-tracking system that gets upset when the names aren't unique. > No comments on your specific patch, I'm too tired. Well, fine. I won't comment on your lack of comments on my patch --- because *I'm* too tired. :)