From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31063 invoked by alias); 2 May 2005 21:00:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29854 invoked from network); 2 May 2005 20:58:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 2 May 2005 20:58:42 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j42KwgEe004474 for ; Mon, 2 May 2005 16:58:42 -0400 Received: from zenia.home.redhat.com (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j42KwfO12088; Mon, 2 May 2005 16:58:41 -0400 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: gdb.base/auxv.exp: 'untested' instead of gdb_suppress_entire_file References: <20050502191423.GA16849@nevyn.them.org> From: Jim Blandy Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 21:00:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20050502191423.GA16849@nevyn.them.org> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00073.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 02:10:31PM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote: > > > > Looking at this message: > > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2005-04/msg00143.html > > > > I gather that changes like the below are welcome --- right? > > > > 2005-05-02 Jim Blandy > > > > * gdb.base/auxv.exp: Call 'untested' and return -1 instead of > > calling gdb_suppress_entire_file. > > Please, yes. The results of gdb_suppress_entire_file are so messy! Okay --- I've committed this one. Thanks!