From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24412 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2006 18:17:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 24403 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jul 2006 18:17:32 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from intranet.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.6) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:17:32 +0000 Received: (qmail 17531 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2006 18:17:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (jimb@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 11 Jul 2006 18:17:29 -0000 To: "Mark Kettenis" Cc: "Nathan Sidwell" , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, "Daniel Jacobowitz" Subject: Re: add vector container type References: <44B2273D.9030906@codesourcery.com> <24259.192.87.1.22.1152532444.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> From: Jim Blandy Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:17:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <24259.192.87.1.22.1152532444.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> (Mark Kettenis's message of "Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:54:04 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-07/txt/msg00091.txt.bz2 "Mark Kettenis" writes: > If this interface is better, are we going to convert other bits of > GDB to use these interfaces? It's a type-safe form of the common idiom for dynamically resized arrays. For me, at least, type safety is a big deal. I definitely think we should convert other pieces of GDB to use it. Is this file modified much from the GCC version? Could GDB and GCC share this from libiberty?