From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17754 invoked by alias); 26 Aug 2003 22:59:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17747 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2003 22:59:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zenia.home) (12.223.225.216) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Aug 2003 22:59:37 -0000 Received: by zenia.home (Postfix, from userid 5433) id 6ABA8202C8; Tue, 26 Aug 2003 17:59:54 -0500 (EST) To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: * solib-svr4.c (bfd_lookup_symbol): New SECT_FLAGS argument. References: <3F4BD27C.9080502@redhat.com> From: Jim Blandy Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 22:59:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <3F4BD27C.9080502@redhat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00463.txt.bz2 I dropped it. Committed now --- thanks for the reminder. Andrew Cagney writes: > Jim, > > What was the final out come of this patch? > > 2003-06-11 Jim Blandy > * solib-svr4.c (bfd_lookup_symbol): New SECT_FLAGS argument. > (enable_break): Pass SEC_CODE as the SECT_FLAGS argument to > bfd_lookup_symbol, since we only want symbols in code sections. > (look_for_base): Pass zero as the SECT_FLAGS argument to > bfd_lookup_symbol, since we're not concerned about which section > the symbol is in. > > it appears to be approved, but not committed? > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2003-06/msg00430.html > > Andrew