From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18649 invoked by alias); 2 Apr 2004 22:27:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18558 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2004 22:27:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Apr 2004 22:27:28 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i32MRRjj010036 for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 17:27:27 -0500 Received: from zenia.home.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i32MRPj08173; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 17:27:26 -0500 To: Paul Hilfinger Cc: drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Introduce notion of "search name" References: <20040303191550.7307DF2DB8@nile.gnat.com> <20040305035955.GH5320@nevyn.them.org> <20040305103925.A4815F2EE4@nile.gnat.com> <20040331221249.GA6811@nevyn.them.org> <20040401150022.GA30729@nevyn.them.org> <20040402092958.9443FF2F3E@nile.gnat.com> From: Jim Blandy Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 22:27:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20040402092958.9443FF2F3E@nile.gnat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00077.txt.bz2 Paul Hilfinger writes: > > I have to say, I think our allocation rules are hairy enough already. > > If there is some better solution on the horizon for lazy demangling's > > allocation, I am relucantant to put in complex and slow mechanisms, > > even temporarily. It's a step backwards, justified by work that isn't > > even scheduled. > > > > Paul, how critical is this to the intent of your change? I haven't > > reviewed it. > > Sorry, I'm not sure what that pesky pronoun "this" refers to here. I meant lazily demangling the names. I was wondering if the demangling could be done at minsym reading time, or psymtab->symtab conversion time, as the other languages do, when there is an appropriate objfile available.