From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30143 invoked by alias); 17 Oct 2004 19:59:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30131 invoked from network); 17 Oct 2004 19:58:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 17 Oct 2004 19:58:59 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9HJwxuv020354 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 15:58:59 -0400 Received: from zenia.home.redhat.com (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i9HJwwr25578; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 15:58:59 -0400 To: Elena Zannoni Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PATCH: Step down from maintainerships References: <16752.3082.255249.837515@localhost.redhat.com> From: Jim Blandy Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 19:59:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <16752.3082.255249.837515@localhost.redhat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00306.txt.bz2 Elena Zannoni writes: > Jim Blandy writes: > > > > There are a few outstanding patches that I had hoped to take care of > > before stepping down, but then this last week some more came in, and I > > realized I'd probably never get caught up. > > Jim, send a list of pointers (with URLs) to the patches and I'll take > care of them. Okay, great. Here are the ones that I know about: - Demangling language needs to be stored in demangled name cache, along with demangled name: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-08/msg00479.html The patch proposed there would undo prior optimizations, which I explain here: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-09/msg00263.html (That message is not part of the same thread, since it's in a different month, so don't miss it.) - Intel Fortran 90 emits debugging information for nested subroutines that produces a malformed block tree: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-08/msg00183.html The thread resumes here: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-09/msg00239.html - GDB's stabs reader tweaks line number information, in a way that's not appropriate for non-GCC stabs. Mark Kettenis posted a patch, and I suggested a revision; I think that's where it stands. http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-09/msg00234.html - Corinna Vinschen proposed a new gdbarch method to let arch-specific code interpret Dwarf 2 DW_AT_calling_convention attributes: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-10/msg00146.html