From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12991 invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2003 17:20:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12984 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2003 17:20:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO monty-python.gnu.org) (199.232.76.173) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Dec 2003 17:20:30 -0000 Received: from [207.232.27.5] (helo=WST0054) by monty-python.gnu.org with asmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AUVNH-0008Nn-HG; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 13:17:19 -0500 Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 17:20:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: "J. Johnston" CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3FD89C2E.9070906@redhat.com> (jjohnstn@redhat.com) Subject: Re: [RFA]: breakpoint.c patch (prelude to pending breakpoint support) Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <3FD7C458.2080404@redhat.com> <3FD89C2E.9070906@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00322.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 11:32:46 -0500 > From: "J. Johnston" > > > > Is this line really that long, or did your mailer mess it up? If the > > former, it needs to be reformatted. > > Eli, I realize you are just making a minor comment, but can I ask that gdb > maintainers please start trusting me on this. Sorry, I didn't in any way mean to say that I didn't trust you. I couldn't possibly know whether what I saw was a real mistake on your part or not, and I think it isn't reasonable to request me to check your previous ChangeLog entries in order to decide one way or the other. One popular reason for messed-up formatting is your mailer, so I took care to inquire about that before assuming that what I see is what you meant. Could we please assume that the comments you get are meant to make sure the code is up to the standards, not to diminish your abilities or show signs of mistrust?