From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8567 invoked by alias); 2 Feb 2004 17:29:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8552 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2004 17:29:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO monty-python.gnu.org) (199.232.76.173) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Feb 2004 17:29:42 -0000 Received: from [207.232.27.5] (helo=WST0054) by monty-python.gnu.org with asmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AnhsH-0001CP-TU; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 12:28:42 -0500 Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 17:29:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Roland McGrath CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <200402020735.i127ZZnS011037@magilla.sf.frob.com> (message from Roland McGrath on Sun, 1 Feb 2004 23:35:35 -0800) Subject: Re: [PATCH] add-symbol-file-from-memory command Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200402020735.i127ZZnS011037@magilla.sf.frob.com> X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00027.txt.bz2 > Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 23:35:35 -0800 > From: Roland McGrath > > > . The first line of the doc string, up until the first \n, should > > be a short description of the command, since that is what GDB > > displays when several commands are listed (e.g., by `apropos' or > > `help files' commands). [Yes, I know: `add-symbol-file' that is > > already there has the same problem.] > > Ok. I used add-symbol-file as the model. How about this text? > > "Load the symbols out of memory from a dynamically loaded object file.\n\ > Specify an expression for the address of the file's shared object file header." Looks good to me, thanks.