Update Copyright and FSF address (was: [RFC] fix testsuite/gdb.cp/printmethod)

Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-17T22:46:50Z

> Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 23:42:36 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
>
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 06:38:03AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 18:08:07 -0500
> > > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> > > Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> > >
> > > I've checked it in, with some formatting/copyright tweaks
> > [...]
> > > --- testsuite/gdb.cp/printmethod.cc 17 Jun 2004 18:30:18 -0000 1.2
> > > +++ testsuite/gdb.cp/printmethod.cc 7 Dec 2005 23:06:43 -0000
> > > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> > > /* This test script is part of GDB, the GNU debugger.
> > >
> > > - Copyright 2002, 2004,
> > > + Copyright 2002, 2004, 2005
> > > Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> >
> > According to the copyright notice rules that RMS just published (they
> > will probably be available as part of standards.texi or
> > maintain.texi), we need to have a "(C)" after the word "Copyright".
> > It's true that we don't have this in most of our files, but we might
> > as well get started...
>
> IMO we really should do them all at once. The other thing we need to
> do is update the FSF address; I have had this flagged to take care of
> since the FSF moved this spring, but I (obviously) haven't found the
> time...

I've committed the first portion of this monstrous job: all the files
in gdb/ and in gdb/cli/ now have the (c) marker and state the correct
FSF address. I hope I didn't break anything, but if I did, please
correct as obvious.

I don't imagine someone would actually wish to see the humongous
boring diffs, would they? ;-)