From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25884 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2006 16:02:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 25871 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jan 2006 16:02:35 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.20) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:02:35 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-246-138.inter.net.il [84.228.246.138]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id CLM89814 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:02:31 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:02:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20060113153213.GA10138@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:32:13 -0500) Subject: Re: [RFA] Allow use of breakpoint commands inside `if' or `while' Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20060113153213.GA10138@nevyn.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-01/txt/msg00143.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:32:13 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 04:48:37PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > The patches below fix this problem. > > > > Okay to commit? > > Well, it looks good to me. Thanks for a prompt review. > I assume this doesn't need any documentation changes It doesn't, the documentation never mentioned any such limitation. > but could you add it to the existing tests for breakpoint commands, > in addition? You mean in gdb.base/commands.exp? I suppose I could do that, but I don't have a test suite set up anywhere on the machines to which I have access, so it might not be easy for me to test the tests I add.