From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10285 invoked by alias); 18 Jul 2006 19:56:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 10276 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jul 2006 19:56:13 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 19:56:11 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-228-156.inter.net.il [80.230.228.156]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id FHM84536 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 18 Jul 2006 22:56:00 +0300 (IDT) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 19:56:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20060718123101.GA14653@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Tue, 18 Jul 2006 08:31:02 -0400) Subject: Re: [commit] Cleanup display.c (and a bit of tracepoint.c too) Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200607172216.k6HMGUfa023698@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20060718123101.GA14653@nevyn.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-07/txt/msg00240.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 08:31:02 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > > Aren't there compilers out there which insist on forward declarations > > for static functions? > > I surely hope not; to the best of my understanding that would be a > violation of the C standard. Which part of the standard invalidates that?