From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27313 invoked by alias); 21 Sep 2005 03:44:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27212 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Sep 2005 03:44:35 -0000 Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 03:44:35 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-29-165.inter.net.il [80.230.29.165]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.8-GR) with ESMTP id CLH69358 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 21 Sep 2005 06:44:31 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 03:44:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Joel Brobecker CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20050920193918.GB10186@adacore.com> (message from Joel Brobecker on Tue, 20 Sep 2005 12:39:18 -0700) Subject: Re: [RFA] print arrays with indexes Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20050918034639.GB6990@nevyn.them.org> <20050918054109.GD2496@adacore.com> <20050918191943.GA27191@nevyn.them.org> <20050920073058.GR2496@adacore.com> <20050920193132.GY2496@adacore.com> <20050920193339.GA28294@nevyn.them.org> <20050920193918.GB10186@adacore.com> X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00186.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 12:39:18 -0700 > From: Joel Brobecker > > > It sounds like we have legitimate reasons for both thresholds. I'm > > getting more inclined to implement neither for now, to prevent confusion. > > This sounds good to me too. Perhaps a compromise between what Eli > suggested and what you have been suggesting would work. How about > we implement a on/off knob for now. Later on, if we understand better > in which direction to use the threshold, then we can enhance the knob > to include "auto", and then have a second knob. Fine with me.