From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 403 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2006 04:25:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 373 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Mar 2006 04:25:56 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Mar 2006 04:25:55 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-194-187.inter.net.il [83.130.194.187]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id DQY78082 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 2 Mar 2006 06:25:51 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 04:25:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20060301193829.GD6465@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Wed, 1 Mar 2006 14:38:29 -0500) Subject: Re: [RFC]: Document patch for F90 derived type support Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20060228135310.GA25487@nevyn.them.org> <20060301043203.GA17621@nevyn.them.org> <20060301050501.GA18703@nevyn.them.org> <20060301193829.GD6465@nevyn.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg00039.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 14:38:29 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > > Perhaps I'm confused: isn't "int4" a 32-bit integer? I thought it > > was, but if I was mistaken, my apologies for the noise. > > It's not reserved at all in the input to the compiler - it might be > something different than a type, or it might be the name of a record > type (whatever the correct name for that is). I'm still not sure I understand, but I think you do agree that this is a 32-bit integer. In that case, I maintain that we should display "integer(4)", not "int4".