From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5405 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2007 10:29:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 5392 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jan 2007 10:29:18 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from heller.inter.net.il (HELO heller.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 10:29:13 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-195-26.inter.net.il [83.130.195.26]) by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id BLR78703 (AUTH halo1); Sat, 6 Jan 2007 12:29:01 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 10:29:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20070105191511.GA1031@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:15:11 -0500) Subject: Re: [rfc] Let the remote protocol report the target's arch Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20061207165207.GA16505@nevyn.them.org> <20070104221622.GM24634@nevyn.them.org> <20070105191511.GA1031@nevyn.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00205.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:15:11 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > Do you think that "set tdesc filename" without a path, or "unset tdesc > filename", is clearer? Yes, I think using unset is better here. There's a sentence in your patch that says: Show the filename to read for a target description, if set. So you also refer to it as ``unset'' in some sense. > Good idea. Thanks for all the comments! Is this better? Yes, I'm happy now. Thanks.