From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7781 invoked by alias); 24 Oct 2008 09:56:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 7773 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Oct 2008 09:56:12 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout1.012.net.il (HELO mtaout1.012.net.il) (84.95.2.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:55:30 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.233.32]) by i-mtaout1.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0K9800193M9JRTE0@i-mtaout1.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:56:08 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:56:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: generic async event handlers in the event loop, for remote non-stop (was: generic `struct serial' interface pipe for remote non-stop) In-reply-to: <200810240132.42007.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: References: <200810240132.42007.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg00603.txt.bz2 > From: Pedro Alves > Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 01:32:41 +0100 > > signal handlers should keep the current behaviour of having high > priority in relation to normal events I don't necessarily disagree, but can you explain why is that?