From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-61227-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 2040 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2009 09:29:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 2032 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Jan 2009 09:29:55 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout1.012.net.il (HELO mtaout1.012.net.il) (84.95.2.1)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:29:08 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout1.012.net.il by i-mtaout1.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KDL00600ZO03Q00@i-mtaout1.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 11:29:16 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.144.144]) by i-mtaout1.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KDL0094TZOSU270@i-mtaout1.012.net.il>; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 11:29:16 +0200 (IST)
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:29:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Use external editor in 'commands' command
In-reply-to: <e598931c0901161408x5179b81fw113f4f9b0052e67b@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alfredo Ortega <ortegaalfredo@gmail.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <uy6xa2sd8.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <e598931c0901141343j79164cf6we2bc5307f41f41da@mail.gmail.com> <e598931c0901141347j4d159f16he23ad164760518ff@mail.gmail.com> <ueiz5wm3n.fsf@gnu.org> <e598931c0901141632m4f124d85l2452f7e2870cad91@mail.gmail.com> <uab9tw67k.fsf@gnu.org> <e598931c0901152338l2b1bde20r7e242167e038ea8f@mail.gmail.com> <u4ozzwrg2.fsf@gnu.org> <e598931c0901161408x5179b81fw113f4f9b0052e67b@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg00397.txt.bz2

> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 20:08:06 -0200
> From: Alfredo Ortega <ortegaalfredo@gmail.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> gcc will complain about tmpnamp() like this:
> 
> test.c:(.text+0x13): warning: the use of `tempnam' is dangerous,
> better use `mkstemp'

You say "tmpnam ()", but the GCC message is for `tempnam'.  Which one
is it?  These are different functions.