From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19148 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2005 12:04:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 19059 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Dec 2005 12:04:17 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 12:04:17 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-245-91.inter.net.il [84.228.245.91]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.2-GA) with ESMTP id DDI61633 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 9 Dec 2005 14:04:09 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 18:58:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Wu Zhou , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20051209050132.GA5325@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Fri, 9 Dec 2005 00:01:32 -0500) Subject: Re: [RFC] GDB patches for hw watchpoints - revised Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20051206202848.GA9568@nevyn.them.org> <20051209050132.GA5325@nevyn.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-12/txt/msg00170.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 00:01:32 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl > > On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 10:25:33AM +0800, Wu Zhou wrote: > > Currently what stored in the siginfo.si_addr is the address of next > > instruction. Anton sent me a patch to change that to the data address > > instead. I am now playing with the patched kernel. > > > > BTW. It seems that to_stopped_data_address is only used in rwatch and > > awatch, which is not that frequently used as watch itself. So may we > > postpone its implementation till some later time? > > No, let's get it right the first time. rwatch is extremely valuable 100% agreement.