From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2482 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2006 07:53:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 2468 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Feb 2006 07:53:37 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from gandalf.inter.net.il (HELO gandalf.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 07:53:36 +0000 Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (nitzan.inter.net.il [192.114.186.20]) by gandalf.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.1-GA) with ESMTP id HVG08331; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 09:53:07 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-136-147.inter.net.il [84.228.136.147]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id CRD90320 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 10 Feb 2006 09:53:06 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 07:53:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20060209223719.GA3865@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Thu, 9 Feb 2006 17:37:19 -0500) Subject: Re: RFA: Support Windows extended error numbers in safe_strerror Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20060203215455.GA3501@nevyn.them.org> <20060206173550.GB22947@nevyn.them.org> <200602062254.k16MsagK009925@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20060206225829.GA31895@nevyn.them.org> <20060208000855.GA5040@nevyn.them.org> <200602082107.k18L7xRh013417@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20060209223719.GA3865@nevyn.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00240.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 17:37:19 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > Anyway, here's a patch updated in every way I can think of to make it > less upsetting. Is this really better? Select to follow in the proper > thread. I'm fine with this, if this is the best compromise we can reach.