From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28402 invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2006 08:10:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 28393 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Apr 2006 08:10:22 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Apr 2006 08:10:21 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-205-75.inter.net.il [83.130.205.75]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id DYZ40638 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 13 Apr 2006 11:10:16 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 08:10:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Jim Blandy CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from Jim Blandy on Wed, 12 Apr 2006 11:38:55 -0700) Subject: Re: RFA: Add 'target |' support for MinGW Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-04/txt/msg00163.txt.bz2 > Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > From: Jim Blandy > Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 11:38:55 -0700 > > > Do we really want binary I/O in _all_ situations? Can it be that, > > depending on the command on the other side of the pipe, someone would > > like the CR characters to be stripped from the EOLs in the incoming > > stuff? The way you wrote it, AFAICS, binary I/O is always used, no > > matter what. > > Well, the pipe is carrying the GDB remote protocol, which is happier > with binary. Do we never ask the remote to list text files, for example?