From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-43660-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 29752 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2006 13:08:14 -0000
Received: (qmail 29735 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Apr 2006 13:08:12 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.20)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 13:08:11 +0000
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-214-179.inter.net.il [83.130.214.179]) 	by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) 	with ESMTP id DDF90821 (AUTH halo1); 	Fri, 14 Apr 2006 16:07:56 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 13:08:00 -0000
Message-Id: <uwtds1f10.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Frederic RISS <frederic.riss@st.com>
CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <1145015039.14807.767.camel@crx549.cro.st.com> (message from 	Frederic RISS on Fri, 14 Apr 2006 13:43:59 +0200)
Subject: Re: [RFC] Don't lose compilation directory in Dwarf2 line-tables
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <1144927446.14807.561.camel@crx549.cro.st.com> 	 <8f2776cb0604131049i69e9b20fv78e60c023f245e56@mail.gmail.com> 	 <1144999942.14807.721.camel@crx549.cro.st.com>  <u1ww035rv.fsf@gnu.org> <1145015039.14807.767.camel@crx549.cro.st.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-04/txt/msg00189.txt.bz2

> From: Frederic RISS <frederic.riss@st.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 13:43:59 +0200
> 
> Which isn't false, but I don't think that the user has the ability to
> specify an empty source path, it at least always contains $cdir and
> $cwd.

You are right.

> If I'm not mistaken and if its not too much nitpicking, shall I commit
> something like the attached patch?

Yes, after you fix the following few gotchas:

>  @item directory
> -Reset the source path to empty again.  This requires confirmation.
> +Reset the source path to its initial value.  This requires confirmation.

Please say ``default value'' instead of ``initial value'', and please
show that default value.

Also, `dir' with no arguments no longer requires a confirmation, so
please delete that sentence.

> -Use @code{directory} with no argument to reset the source path to empty.
> +Use @code{directory} with no argument to reset the source path to its initial value.

Same here: please say ``default value''.

Thanks.