From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-45822-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 9985 invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2006 15:10:57 -0000
Received: (qmail 9975 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Oct 2006 15:10:56 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.20)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:10:53 +0000
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-238-176.inter.net.il [84.228.238.176]) 	by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) 	with ESMTP id EXK26852 (AUTH halo1); 	Fri, 13 Oct 2006 17:10:44 +0200 (IST)
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:10:00 -0000
Message-Id: <uwt74i747.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
CC: brobecker@adacore.com, drow@false.org, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl,         gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <jefydtpp79.fsf@sykes.suse.de> (message from Andreas Schwab on 	Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:46:02 +0200)
Subject: Re: [rfc] Clarify shared library warning
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <20061010145213.GA20993@nevyn.them.org> <uejtfkgia.fsf@gnu.org> 	<20061010213438.GC1059@adacore.com> 	<20061011133756.GB25164@nevyn.them.org> 	<9704.82.92.89.47.1160598745.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> 	<20061011203928.GA9409@nevyn.them.org> <u1wpejgxf.fsf@gnu.org> 	<20061012055231.GG1059@adacore.com> 	<E1GXuTO-0005d9-2I@fencepost.gnu.org> <jefydtpp79.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-10/txt/msg00153.txt.bz2

> From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
> Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, drow@false.org,
> 	mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:46:02 +0200
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > How about this, then:
> >
> > warning: .dynamic section for "/lib/libc.so.6" is not at the expected address
> >          (wrong library or library version mismatch?)
> 
> Isn't "wrong library" a superset of "library version mismatch"?

It is, but messages to users don't need such mathematical rigour.  I
imagine some users won't immediately realize that ``wrong library''
might mean libc.so.6 instead of libc.so.7; ``version mismatch'' goes a
long way towards spelling out that possibility, IMO.