From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31801 invoked by alias); 12 Jun 2007 20:05:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 31788 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jun 2007 20:05:34 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.22) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:05:28 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-229-207-135.inter.net.il [84.229.207.135]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id GYU53455 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:05:29 +0300 (IDT) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:05:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20070612123731.GA5373@caradoc.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Tue, 12 Jun 2007 08:37:31 -0400) Subject: Re: [rfa/doc] Add version to XML target descriptions Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20070612123731.GA5373@caradoc.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00209.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 08:37:31 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > Eli, does the documentation update look OK? Yes, but I suggest to give "version" a @code markup here: > +useful for XML validation tools. The version attribute for ^^^^^^^