From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12089 invoked by alias); 2 May 2008 15:46:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 12080 invoked by uid 22791); 2 May 2008 15:46:53 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout5.012.net.il (HELO mtaout5.012.net.il) (84.95.2.13) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 May 2008 15:46:34 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.228.217]) by i_mtaout5.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0K0900EIT0GEXLK4@i_mtaout5.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 02 May 2008 19:00:14 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 15:47:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: RFC: Use the ARM CPSR as a fallback to determine ARM/Thumb In-reply-to: <20080502140254.GE29202@caradoc.them.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: References: <20060220214918.GA28798@nevyn.them.org> <1140519913.27380.29.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> <20060221153601.GA21183@nevyn.them.org> <20060302221446.GA18830@nevyn.them.org> <20080501183805.GA22218@caradoc.them.org> <20080502140254.GE29202@caradoc.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00096.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 10:02:54 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > Is this better? Yes, except that I think "CPSR" should be in @code. > > > + These variables control how ARM GDB determines whether instructions > > ^^^^^^^^^ > > "commands", not "variables", I think. > > I agree, changed. (There's a "variable" reference to a set command a > few lines above, though). Nobody is perfect...