Re: [reverse RFC] Add documentation for process record and replay

teawater
2008-10-16T07:05:28Z

Great! I will change it.

On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 15:01, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:09:33 +0800
>> From: teawater <teawater@gmail.com>
>> Cc: "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@vmware.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>>
>> How about change it to "if the next instruction has the execution log for it"?
>
> I think this is better:
>
> if the execution log includes the record for the next instruction, ...
>