From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-59814-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 32009 invoked by alias); 11 Nov 2008 04:11:27 -0000
Received: (qmail 31925 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Nov 2008 04:11:27 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout3.012.net.il (HELO mtaout3.012.net.il) (84.95.2.7)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 04:10:45 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout3.012.net.il by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KA500200ICE3T00@i_mtaout3.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 06:12:30 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.241.172]) by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KA5005EFICT9V12@i_mtaout3.012.net.il>; Tue, 11 Nov 2008 06:12:30 +0200 (IST)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 05:03:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: too many "no debugging symbols found" messages from shared libs
In-reply-to: <20081110204431.GA3771@caradoc.them.org>
X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: dje@google.com, brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <uwsfaq4vt.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20081003213402.7739F1C78EB@localhost> <20081030040428.GC13387@adacore.com> <e394668d0811071444m14cce80bgc554d83c699e9773@mail.gmail.com> <ufxm2shon.fsf@gnu.org> <20081110144528.GC12962@caradoc.them.org> <u3ahzqqic.fsf@gnu.org> <20081110204431.GA3771@caradoc.them.org>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg00205.txt.bz2

> Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 15:44:31 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: dje@google.com, brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:23:39PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > It's been a long day, and I'm no longer sure I understand whether what
> > you are saying is something different from what I said.  Are you
> > saying that even if the user turns on the option to print this for
> > each shared library, we should not print that (or not have the
> > option)?  I'm okay with having such an option off by default, but I
> > was asking to display a file name if the option is ON.
> 
> I'm confused too - what option?

I thought the original patch came with a suggestion to add an option,
in case user wanted to see these messages.