From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3804 invoked by alias); 14 Mar 2009 22:09:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 3653 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Mar 2009 22:09:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout7.012.net.il (HELO mtaout7.012.net.il) (84.95.2.19) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 22:09:46 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout7.012.net.il by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KGI00300O6J9X00@i-mtaout7.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sun, 15 Mar 2009 00:09:53 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.228.91]) by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KGI004Q4O8GVQI0@i-mtaout7.012.net.il>; Sun, 15 Mar 2009 00:09:53 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 22:18:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [patch] Fix `return' of long/long-long results with no debuginfo In-reply-to: <20090314214401.GA18006@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, tromey@redhat.com, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: References: <200903042129.n24LTUKa000770@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20090309015510.GA28986@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <200903092233.n29MXEfG019900@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20090311163024.GA25708@adacore.com> <20090311205901.GB25708@adacore.com> <20090313171134.GA4396@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20090313224653.GA30693@adacore.com> <20090314214401.GA18006@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00233.txt.bz2 > Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 22:44:01 +0100 > From: Jan Kratochvil > Cc: Tom Tromey , Mark Kettenis , > drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 11:21:30 +0100, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Thanks, this part is approved, provided that you add the missing > > punctuation and clarify the text, as indicated below. > > Tried to address all your objections. Thanks, this version is fine.