From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32635 invoked by alias); 13 Aug 2005 11:07:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32612 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Aug 2005 11:07:33 -0000 Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.20) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 11:07:33 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-249-180.inter.net.il [83.130.249.180]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.6.5-GR) with ESMTP id BDH65931 (AUTH halo1); Sat, 13 Aug 2005 14:07:30 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 11:13:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20050812205714.GB30801@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:57:14 -0400) Subject: Re: RFC: MI output during program execution Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20050809181311.GB3012@white> <20050809223421.GB3557@white> <20050810004128.GA4264@nevyn.them.org> <20050810004826.GD3557@white> <2040BEEA-4200-4118-91EB-D093ED4D37A1@apple.com> <20050812012810.GA10011@white> <20050812114929.GB10917@white> <20050812205714.GB30801@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2005-08/txt/msg00155.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:57:14 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > In any case, I don't know that the observers implementation, per se, is > a good fit for this particular usage anyway. MI is not an optional > component, nor would most of the events in question be optional > components; the data flow is simple, just as you described above. > We can just call MI at the right points. If it's easy to do that, let's do it. > Or add a small level of abstraction, and call all registered > interfaces (TUI, CLI, MI) and see if any of them need to generate > notifications. Or this.