From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11971 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2005 19:45:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 11961 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Dec 2005 19:45:13 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 19:45:11 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-167-31.inter.net.il [84.228.167.31]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.2-GA) with ESMTP id DFM59599 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 22 Dec 2005 21:44:24 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 20:52:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Wu Zhou CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, drow@false.org, mark@xs4all.nl, bje@au1.ibm.com, anton@au1.ibm.com In-reply-to: (message from Wu Zhou on Thu, 22 Dec 2005 12:47:18 +0800 (CST)) Subject: Re: [RFC] GDB patches for hw watchpoints - revised Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-12/txt/msg00272.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 12:47:18 +0800 (CST) > From: Wu Zhou > cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, drow@false.org, mark@xs4all.nl, bje@au1.ibm.com, anton@au1.ibm.com > > > After we get stopped data address, we can set it back to 0, because it is > not used any more if not hit another time by a h/w watchpoint. Did it > make sense? Yes, I think so.