From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-42585-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 4569 invoked by alias); 2 Feb 2006 04:18:21 -0000
Received: (qmail 4559 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Feb 2006 04:18:19 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from gandalf.inter.net.il (HELO gandalf.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.17)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 04:18:15 +0000
Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (nitzan.inter.net.il [192.114.186.20]) 	by gandalf.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.1-GA) 	with ESMTP id HTE40035; 	Thu, 2 Feb 2006 06:18:10 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-33-78.inter.net.il [80.230.33.78]) 	by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) 	with ESMTP id CPP17629 (AUTH halo1); 	Thu, 2 Feb 2006 06:18:09 +0200 (IST)
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 04:18:00 -0000
Message-Id: <uvevyjsvu.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20060201231422.GC14187@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel 	Jacobowitz on Wed, 1 Feb 2006 18:14:22 -0500)
Subject: Re: [RFC] Alternate approach to keeping convenience variables
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <4381DC75.80800@st.com> <8f2776cb0511212138g2adef40cr1632365c00e3bebc@mail.gmail.com> <43835114.5060401@st.com> <20051209205923.GA21331@nevyn.them.org> <20060122213118.GH27224@nevyn.them.org> <20060201231422.GC14187@nevyn.them.org>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00023.txt.bz2

> Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 18:14:22 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: Andrew STUBBS <andrew.stubbs@st.com>, Jim Blandy <jimb@red-bean.com>
> 
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 04:31:18PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >   - gdbint; I couldn't find a vaguely appropriate place to add a
> >     description of this, and I don't think it's such a fascinating
> >     approach that it's worth creating a new section for.
> 
> Eli convinced me otherwise.  Eli, how does the below look?

It's fine.  Thanks!