From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-50448-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 28914 invoked by alias); 21 Aug 2007 19:04:17 -0000
Received: (qmail 28768 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Aug 2007 19:04:16 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.24)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:04:10 +0000
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-241-15.inter.net.il [84.228.241.15]) 	by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) 	with ESMTP id IRU82525 (AUTH halo1); 	Tue, 21 Aug 2007 22:03:59 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:04:00 -0000
Message-Id: <uveb8u2u2.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20070821142500.GA28295@caradoc.them.org> (message from Daniel 	Jacobowitz on Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:25:00 -0400)
Subject: Re: [rfc] Allow watchpoints on inaccessible memory
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References:  <20070821142500.GA28295@caradoc.them.org>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00421.txt.bz2

> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:25:00 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> 
> This is much nicer :-)  Any opinions on this change?

I like it.

> Also, does it deserve a NEWS entry

Yes, I'd think so.

> and should it go in 6.7?

Don't see why not.

Thanks.