From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19226 invoked by alias); 22 Sep 2007 14:13:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 19212 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Sep 2007 14:13:32 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.22) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Sep 2007 14:13:26 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-229-122-46.inter.net.il [84.229.122.46]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id HWC17015 (AUTH halo1); Sat, 22 Sep 2007 16:10:39 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 14:13:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20070922140409.GB6285@caradoc.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:04:09 -0400) Subject: Re: [rfc, rfa/doc] Multi-threaded watchpoint improvements Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20070916183949.GA23966@caradoc.them.org> <20070922140409.GB6285@caradoc.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-09/txt/msg00300.txt.bz2 > Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:04:09 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > > watched value has changed. Watchpoints whose watched values has > > changed are announced as hit. > > "have changed", right? Blush. Yes, of course. > > > +@value{GDBN} only supports process-wide watchpoints. > > > > "Process-wide watchpoints'' as opposed to what? > > As opposed to thread-specific watchpoints. We can make a watchpoint > act like it is thread-specific (or we will be able to once Luis's > patch is done), but we don't support setting hardware watchpoints that > only trigger in a specific thread. Yet, anyway. I think you should add something like this explanation, to make the intent clear.