From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-62184-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 11546 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2009 04:14:23 -0000
Received: (qmail 11537 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Mar 2009 04:14:23 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_JMF_BR,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout6.012.net.il (HELO mtaout6.012.net.il) (84.95.2.16)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 04:14:17 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout6.012.net.il by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KGM00L00UERS300@i-mtaout6.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 06:14:55 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.218.225]) by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KGM008G8UGUEQA0@i-mtaout6.012.net.il>; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 06:14:55 +0200 (IST)
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 04:52:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] disassemble-next-line
In-reply-to: <daef60380903161917u5e3fe76eqbcebdf9d42507ddb@mail.gmail.com>
To: teawater <teawater@gmail.com>
Cc: dje@google.com, tromey@redhat.com, pedro@codesourcery.com, drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <uvdq8rdkd.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <daef60380903072134n381d57a8ob82ac9c777d97bff@mail.gmail.com> <m3vdqi67lg.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <daef60380903102016n3c8476b3w3e890df80c699ef@mail.gmail.com> <daef60380903121655o472538c9h84e25fac3548fb66@mail.gmail.com> <ubps5sqmf.fsf@gnu.org> <daef60380903152351n71100aecp8fbe3210f5e32a95@mail.gmail.com> <umyblqnp2.fsf@gnu.org> <e394668d0903161231w7c2c7268w6f0ba1e3d8ebf7d4@mail.gmail.com> <uiqm9qmad.fsf@gnu.org> <daef60380903161917u5e3fe76eqbcebdf9d42507ddb@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00294.txt.bz2

> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:17:16 +0800
> From: teawater <teawater@gmail.com>
> Cc: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>, tromey@redhat.com, pedro@codesourcery.com, 
> 	drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> I think pc address doesn't have line info have 2 reasons:
> 
> 1.  Compile without -g
> 2.  Some code doesn't have line info.  for example: plt code, lib code.

OK.  In that case, I suggest the following rewording:

 If AUTO (which is the default), or there's no line info to determine
 the source line of the next instruction, display disassembly of next
 instruction instead.