From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-62597-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 17395 invoked by alias); 31 Mar 2009 18:31:43 -0000
Received: (qmail 17264 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Mar 2009 18:31:36 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_37,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout2.012.net.il (HELO mtaout2.012.net.il) (84.95.2.4)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:31:30 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout2.012.net.il by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KHD00M00VF72Z00@i_mtaout2.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:31:27 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.70.3.64]) by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KHD00GSQVGEWN20@i_mtaout2.012.net.il>; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:31:27 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:20:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA/doco] Document task-specific breakpoints
In-reply-to: <20090331165513.GE9472@adacore.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <uvdppk0l4.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20090325214556.GD9472@adacore.com> <20090325220236.GF9472@adacore.com> <20090331165513.GE9472@adacore.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00707.txt.bz2

> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:55:13 -0700
> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> 
> > 2009-03-25  Joel Brobecker  <brobecker@adacore.com>
> > 
> >         * gdb.texinfo (Ada Tasks): Add documentation about task-specific
> >         breakpoints.
> 
> I checked this patch in, with "Running" changed to "Runnable".
> For the record, here is the final patch.

Thanks.

I wonder: would it make sense to add to this text elsewhere in the
manual:

 @item Runnable
 The task is not blocked for any reason known to Ada.  (It may be waiting
 for a mutex, though.) It is conceptually "executing" in normal mode.

something that mentions the possibility that the task could be stopped
at a breakpoint, not only waiting for a mutex?