From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12476 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2004 05:52:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12461 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2004 05:52:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO monty-python.gnu.org) (199.232.76.173) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Apr 2004 05:52:49 -0000 Received: from [207.232.27.5] (helo=WST0054) by monty-python.gnu.org with asmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BFoBB-0007IN-FC; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 01:52:21 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 05:52:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Brian Ford CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from Brian Ford on Mon, 19 Apr 2004 11:21:35 -0500 (CDT)) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Proper _to_regnum for DWARF on Cygwin Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200404161650.i3GGoPxI054716@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <200404181838.i3IIccMf006115@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00459.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 11:21:35 -0500 (CDT) > From: Brian Ford > > I'm seriously considering reverting that change. I believe my original > gut feeling was correct before Jim Blandy convinced me otherwise. > Comments before I post the patch to do so? FWIW, I tend to agree that Cygwin should use the same register numbering as almost all the other i386 targets.