From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13517 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2006 15:17:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 13509 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Feb 2006 15:17:23 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from gandalf.inter.net.il (HELO gandalf.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 15:17:22 +0000 Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (nitzan.inter.net.il [192.114.186.20]) by gandalf.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.1-GA) with ESMTP id HTT08685; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 17:16:56 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-244-26.inter.net.il [84.228.244.26]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id CPY82831 (AUTH halo1); Sat, 4 Feb 2006 17:16:55 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 15:17:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Mark Kettenis CC: ian@airs.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <200602041352.k14DqlTM020151@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (message from Mark Kettenis on Sat, 4 Feb 2006 14:52:47 +0100 (CET)) Subject: Re: RFA: Support Windows extended error numbers in safe_strerror Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20060203215455.GA3501@nevyn.them.org> <200602032325.k13NPJ6g028001@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <8f2776cb0602031706s55e09abfr4354becf8278921c@mail.gmail.com> <20060204030025.GA9890@nevyn.them.org> <200602041352.k14DqlTM020151@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00081.txt.bz2 > Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 14:52:47 +0100 (CET) > From: Mark Kettenis > CC: ian@airs.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > That said, I'd probably object if someone would contribute a DJGPP > port with all its #ifdef's today. Sometimes, there's no other good way, if the original code was too entrenched in Posix assumptions (which isn't portability in my book, btw). Again, I wonder why you didn't back me up back when Mark Mitchell submitted his `select' emulation and I suggested to encapsulate the Windows-specific bits in a Windows-specific file. Did you change your views since then?