From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-49658-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 22557 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2007 17:46:27 -0000
Received: (qmail 22546 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jun 2007 17:46:26 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.24)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jun 2007 17:46:24 +0000
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-242-61.inter.net.il [84.228.242.61]) 	by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) 	with ESMTP id IFC14504 (AUTH halo1); 	Fri, 29 Jun 2007 20:46:17 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 18:33:00 -0000
Message-Id: <utzsqmz6b.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Markus Deuling <deuling@de.ibm.com>
CC: drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, uweigand@de.ibm.com
In-reply-to: <468381E0.9020206@de.ibm.com> (message from Markus Deuling on 	Thu, 28 Jun 2007 11:39:44 +0200)
Subject: Re: [rfc] Replace macros by gdbarch functions in gdbint manual
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <4678FEBE.7040209@de.ibm.com> <u7ipyqxxz.fsf@gnu.org> <467B7557.9000708@de.ibm.com> <uodj7p04s.fsf@gnu.org> <4681382D.1070708@de.ibm.com> <u1wfxntc4.fsf@gnu.org> <20070627201134.GA8087@caradoc.them.org> <uzm2kn5a5.fsf@gnu.org> <468381E0.9020206@de.ibm.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00531.txt.bz2

> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 11:39:44 +0200
> From: Markus Deuling <deuling@de.ibm.com>
> CC: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
>         uweigand@de.ibm.com
> 
> Ok, I added "is non-zero".

Thanks.

One last request (you can commit this after fixing the problem I show
below, without a need for any further approvals):

> +Number of bits in a long long integer; defaults to @code{2 * gdbarch_long_bit
> + (@var{gdbarch})}.

Please find all the occurrences of @code with whitespace inside the
braces, such as in the above snippet, and enclose it in @w, like this:

 +Number of bits in a long long integer; defaults to @w{@code{2 * gdbarch_long_bit
 + (@var{gdbarch})}}.

This is to prevent TeX from breaking up the argument of @code between
two lines, since it's a single expression.

Thanks again for working on this.