From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15314 invoked by alias); 9 Aug 2005 19:36:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31914 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Aug 2005 19:27:41 -0000 Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.20) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 19:27:41 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-149-176.inter.net.il [80.230.149.176]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.6.5-GR) with ESMTP id BCK25909 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 9 Aug 2005 22:27:32 +0300 (IDT) Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 19:39:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Jim Ingham , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20050809181311.GB3012@white> (message from Bob Rossi on Tue, 9 Aug 2005 14:13:11 -0400) Subject: Re: RFC: MI output during program execution Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <1123605445.30442.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com> <20050809181311.GB3012@white> X-SW-Source: 2005-08/txt/msg00109.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 14:13:11 -0400 > From: Bob Rossi > Cc: Jim Ingham , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > > I thought we wanted to have _both_ CLI and MI style response in this > > case: the CLI response to display in the command buffer, the MI > > response to be caught by the front end in order to change the display > > in other windows. Am I missing something? > > Yes, this sounds nice to me. Currently, querying GDB/MI's state, via an > MI function allows this, without any modifications to GDB/MI. How would the FE know that it needs to query the state? Isn't that the problem?