From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Andrew STUBBS <andrew.stubbs@st.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use search path for scripts
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 19:42:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <usltv5b3o.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <437C6D69.1030209@st.com> (message from Andrew STUBBS on Thu, 17 Nov 2005 11:45:45 +0000)
> Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 11:45:45 +0000
> From: Andrew STUBBS <andrew.stubbs@st.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
>
> If the current directory was searched first then a users own scripts may
> accidentally (and silently) override the intended script causing a
> support headache.
>
> In short, the chosen strategy ensures that our product always works as
> our customers expect.
Sorry, I don't think that the peculiar setup on your systems is a
reason good enough to change the current behavior in an incompatible
fashion. Your specific problem could have been solved in a different
way, for example by having all your system-wide scripts begin with a
reserved string (you could make that string include some unusual
characters to minimize the possibility of a name clash with user
scripts).
> In addition, this way round you can always specify which file you mean
> by adding './' whereas the other way round requires a lot more typing to
> say what you mean when it doesn't do what you expect.
That could very well be so, but what you see as a disadvantage is what
happens today. No doubt users are used to that extra typing when they
need it (which I suppose happens fairly rarely in most debugging
setups).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-17 19:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-16 19:36 Andrew STUBBS
2005-11-17 0:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-17 12:41 ` Andrew STUBBS
2005-11-17 19:42 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2005-11-18 13:23 ` Andrew STUBBS
2005-11-18 14:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-18 15:54 ` Andrew STUBBS
2005-11-25 18:02 ` Andrew STUBBS
2005-11-25 18:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-25 18:33 ` Andrew STUBBS
2005-11-25 18:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-25 20:12 ` Andrew STUBBS
2005-11-25 21:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-25 22:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-28 19:34 ` Andrew STUBBS
2005-11-25 21:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-25 21:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-01-12 0:09 ` Andrew STUBBS
2006-01-22 20:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-23 16:29 ` Andrew STUBBS
2006-01-23 17:41 ` Andrew STUBBS
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=usltv5b3o.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=andrew.stubbs@st.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox