Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Andrew STUBBS <andrew.stubbs@st.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use search path for scripts
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 19:42:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <usltv5b3o.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <437C6D69.1030209@st.com> (message from Andrew STUBBS on Thu, 17 Nov 2005 11:45:45 +0000)

> Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 11:45:45 +0000
> From: Andrew STUBBS <andrew.stubbs@st.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> 
> If the current directory was searched first then a users own scripts may 
> accidentally (and silently) override the intended script causing a 
> support headache.
> 
> In short, the chosen strategy ensures that our product always works as 
> our customers expect.

Sorry, I don't think that the peculiar setup on your systems is a
reason good enough to change the current behavior in an incompatible
fashion.  Your specific problem could have been solved in a different
way, for example by having all your system-wide scripts begin with a
reserved string (you could make that string include some unusual
characters to minimize the possibility of a name clash with user
scripts).

> In addition, this way round you can always specify which file you mean 
> by adding './' whereas the other way round requires a lot more typing to 
> say what you mean when it doesn't do what you expect.

That could very well be so, but what you see as a disadvantage is what
happens today.  No doubt users are used to that extra typing when they
need it (which I suppose happens fairly rarely in most debugging
setups).


  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-17 19:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-16 19:36 Andrew STUBBS
2005-11-17  0:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-17 12:41   ` Andrew STUBBS
2005-11-17 19:42     ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2005-11-18 13:23       ` Andrew STUBBS
2005-11-18 14:53         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-18 15:54           ` Andrew STUBBS
2005-11-25 18:02             ` Andrew STUBBS
2005-11-25 18:12             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-25 18:33               ` Andrew STUBBS
2005-11-25 18:39                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-25 20:12                   ` Andrew STUBBS
2005-11-25 21:26                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-25 22:33                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-28 19:34                     ` Andrew STUBBS
2005-11-25 21:56                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-25 21:43               ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-01-12  0:09             ` Andrew STUBBS
2006-01-22 20:40               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-23 16:29                 ` Andrew STUBBS
2006-01-23 17:41                   ` Andrew STUBBS

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=usltv5b3o.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=andrew.stubbs@st.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox