From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4511 invoked by alias); 13 May 2006 10:14:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 4431 invoked by uid 22791); 13 May 2006 10:14:48 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 May 2006 10:14:26 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-243-9.inter.net.il [83.130.243.9]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id EEE14568 (AUTH halo1); Sat, 13 May 2006 13:14:22 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 10:34:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Nick Roberts CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <17510.62647.981723.46175@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> (message from Nick Roberts on Sun, 14 May 2006 21:13:27 +1200) Subject: Re: New branch [was Re: RFC: MI output during program execution] Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <17458.60694.135878.624750@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20060404220637.GA12064@nevyn.them.org> <17486.36188.127822.347550@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20060504150414.GE32605@nevyn.them.org> <17508.18716.564160.93092@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20060512124331.GA3460@nevyn.them.org> <17510.34460.791254.936961@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17510.62647.981723.46175@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00285.txt.bz2 > From: Nick Roberts > Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 21:13:27 +1200 > Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > > You said at some point that manual changes are on your todo, but the > > TODO file you sent doesn't mention that. Please make sure the manual > > changes are eventually included, because otherwise I will object to > > merging this branch onto HEAD. TIA. > > Sorry, I meant it was on my todo list (lower case). AFAIK Daniel was talking > about changing gdb+dejagnu to just gdb in gdbint.texi. I was just saying > I hadn't forgotten that. So does this mean you don't plan on modifying the manual to reflect the changes on the async branch?