From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28246 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2007 07:29:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 28235 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Dec 2007 07:29:17 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.22) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 07:29:11 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-33-126.inter.net.il [80.230.33.126]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id IMS60329 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 7 Dec 2007 09:26:34 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 13:36:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Jim Blandy CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: (message from Jim Blandy on Thu, 06 Dec 2007 22:19:11 -0800) Subject: Re: RFA: Remove unused support for target-based exception handling Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00120.txt.bz2 > From: Jim Blandy > Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 22:19:11 -0800 > > This was kind of like finding something old and nasty in the back of > the fridge. :) Could you (or someone else) perhaps tell the history of this code? Like when it was introduced and for what purposes, and how it became unused? Also, doesn't the manual needs to be fixed if we remove this?