From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-52950-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 1555 invoked by alias); 30 Dec 2007 04:20:22 -0000
Received: (qmail 1544 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Dec 2007 04:20:21 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.24)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Dec 2007 04:20:13 +0000
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-229-120-75.inter.net.il [84.229.120.75]) 	by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) 	with ESMTP id JTG80199 (AUTH halo1); 	Sun, 30 Dec 2007 06:19:45 +0200 (IST)
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 04:32:00 -0000
Message-Id: <usl1kx18v.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20071230025754.GA26252@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> (message from 	Christopher Faylor on Sat, 29 Dec 2007 21:57:54 -0500)
Subject: Re: PR/2386 [2/2]: MinGW attach to process without an exec file
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <47744F9C.8040604@portugalmail.pt> <20071228013457.GB7602@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <477579E0.5010809@portugalmail.pt> <20071229035030.GC30002@adacore.com> <47764306.4060903@portugalmail.pt> <20071229180146.GC24999@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4776CDA3.90204@portugalmail.pt> <20071230025754.GA26252@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00472.txt.bz2

> Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 21:57:54 -0500
> From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@sourceware.org>
> 
> I don't think there is any reason to now add Windows 9x support for
> features that have been missing for years so I didn't do that.  I
> did issue an error when psapi.dll was not found however.
> [...]
> +  if (psapi_loaded < 0)
> +    warning(_("working version of psapi.dll not found.  DLL and executable filenames may not be available."));

This is not a useful message, IMHO.  I, as a user, would not know what
to do with it.  We need to says specifically that attach without an
exec file name will not work, and that users should use `file'
etc. commands to work around.