From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19664 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2008 19:10:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 19654 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jan 2008 19:10:19 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from heller.inter.net.il (HELO heller.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.23) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:09:56 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-236-100.inter.net.il [84.228.236.100]) by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id EPH18141 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 9 Jan 2008 21:09:20 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:10:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Aleksandar Ristovski CC: drow@false.org, dje@google.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, RMansfield@qnx.com In-reply-to: <2F6320727174C448A52CEB63D85D11F40A76@nova.ott.qnx.com> (message from Aleksandar Ristovski on Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:13:11 -0500) Subject: Re: [patch] IS_ABSOLUTE_PATH to handle both DOS and POSIX path st yles Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <2F6320727174C448A52CEB63D85D11F40A76@nova.ott.qnx.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00203.txt.bz2 > From: Aleksandar Ristovski > Cc: dje@google.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Ryan Mansfield > Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:13:11 -0500 > > (This only works for drive letter in DOS paths, doesn't address the dir. > Separator issue). Right, and therefore why is it useful to consider partial solutions? Can we at all use similar method to handle the slashes?