From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-61120-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 20326 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2009 18:55:08 -0000
Received: (qmail 20318 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jan 2009 18:55:08 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.4 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BARRACUDA_BRBL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout5.012.net.il (HELO mtaout5.012.net.il) (84.95.2.13)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:54:27 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout5.012.net.il by i_mtaout5.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KDF00G00AYE4400@i_mtaout5.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:54:34 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.230.7]) by i_mtaout5.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KDF00FQWB6XEQF2@i_mtaout5.012.net.il>; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:54:34 +0200 (IST)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:55:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [2/2] Inspect extra signal information
In-reply-to: <200901131231.59701.pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <usknnavfj.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <200901121846.51709.pedro@codesourcery.com> <200901121849.38334.pedro@codesourcery.com> <u63kkco46.fsf@gnu.org> <200901131231.59701.pedro@codesourcery.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg00290.txt.bz2

> From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:31:59 +0000
> 
> I've updated the docs with the attached diff.

Thanks.  This version is OK.

> I also noticed that the write packets have a @var{} around the
> object name, but the read ones don't:
> 
>  @item qXfer:@var{spu}:write
> 
>  @item qXfer:auxv:read
>  @item qXfer:libraries:read
> 
> I copied that, but which one is the correct form?

@var{spu} is incorrect, since "spu" is a literal string, it does not
stand for something else.  Please remove those extra @var if you have
a moment to spare.