From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20833 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2004 06:09:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20826 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2004 06:09:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO monty-python.gnu.org) (199.232.76.173) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Feb 2004 06:09:31 -0000 Received: from [207.232.27.5] (helo=WST0054) by monty-python.gnu.org with asmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AqnWs-0007Ku-Da; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 01:07:22 -0500 Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 06:09:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Elena Zannoni CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <16425.16481.598965.602145@localhost.redhat.com> (message from Elena Zannoni on Tue, 10 Feb 2004 15:34:41 -0500) Subject: Re: [RFA/doco] add obstacks to gdbint.texi Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <16425.5280.824503.7068@localhost.redhat.com> <6654-Tue10Feb2004210510+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> <16425.13661.237505.892571@localhost.redhat.com> <7494-Tue10Feb2004220655+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> <16425.16481.598965.602145@localhost.redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00276.txt.bz2 > From: Elena Zannoni > Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 15:34:41 -0500 > > > > > > Ok, is there something in .emacs that I should set to get this done when > > > I do an 'esc-q' for instance? > > > > It does that for me by default. If it doesn't for you, perhaps you > > have sentence-end-double-space set to nil somehow. > > Something screwy with my emacs, no doubt. But the variable is set > correctly. Then perhaps you have some non-default setting for sentence-end. > ok. Also corrected the lie about xmalloc/xfree. > > Index: gdbint.texinfo This version is fine, I have only one more suggestion: > +@value{GDBN} uses various features provided by the @code{libiberty} > +library, for instance the C++ demangler, the @acronym{IEEE} floating The "C++" thingie will look prettier in the printed manual if you spell it as "C@t{++}", as then TeX will typeset the "++" part with a typewriter face, as it does with the C operator "++" in a code fragment. Thanks.